Public COA audit
Buffered NAD+
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- NBD202601
- Issue date
- 2026-02-08
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.3 ppm, As <0.1 ppm, Cd <0.05 ppm, Hg <0.5 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals panel complete
ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg with EPA-referenced methods. All elements pass acceptance limits. Spike recovery QC confirms method suitability (98-106% recovery, all within 70-150% criteria).
Professional lab presentation
Kovera Labs report with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), sample ID KVR-2026-727511, access code 5179D3. Dual authorization by QC Analyst (Liam Clarke, B.S.) and Quality Director (David Cohen, M.S.).
Test date documented
Test date February 08, 2026 is clearly stated and falls within acceptable range (on or before 2026-07-28).
Batch information present
Lot/Batch NBD202601 clearly documented with product name (Buffered NAD+), strength (750 mg), and condition (Lyophilized).
Limited scope - heavy metals only
This is a specialized heavy metals analysis report only. No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), purity assessment, or microbial/endotoxin testing included. This is typical for a targeted metals panel but does not constitute a complete COA for peptide quality verification.
No identity or purity data
Document does not include HPLC purity, mass spec identity confirmation, or other peptide-specific quality metrics. This appears to be a supplementary metals analysis rather than a primary peptide COA.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.