Public COA audit
Klow
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- KW202604
- Sample date
- 2026-04-20
- Issue date
- 2026-04-21
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth (Bacteria), Not Detected (Fungi/Yeast)
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Sterility testing present
USP <71> rapid sterility screening performed with 14-day incubation period. Both bacterial (aerobic/anaerobic) and fungal/yeast testing passed.
Batch information complete
Lot number KW202604 clearly stated with sample name Klow and matrix identified as lyophilized powder.
Date sequence logical
Sample received 04/20/2026, certified 04/21/2026 - one day turnaround is consistent with rapid screening methodology.
Testing lab identified
Kovera Labs clearly identified with report number KVR-2026-902ECB and access code 902ECB for verification.
Limited scope - sterility only
This is a specialized sterility screening report only. No identity, purity, heavy metals, endotoxin, or other typical COA panels present. This is appropriate for a sterility-focused test but not a comprehensive COA.
Professional presentation
Clean, professional layout with clear sections, QR code for verification, and product photo included. Methodology and limitations clearly disclosed.
Methodology disclosure
Document explicitly states this is a 'rapid screening method' for 'quality control purposes' and notes that 'full USP <71> sterility testing may be required' for regulatory compliance. This transparency is good but indicates this is preliminary testing.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.