Public COA audit
Kisspeptin-10
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- KSS2607
- Sample date
- 2026-06-30
- Issue date
- 2026-06-30
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No microbial growth detected
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
Pass - Bacteria (Aerobic/Anaerobic): No Growth; Fungi/Yeast: Not Detected
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Limited scope - sterility only
This is a single-panel sterility screening report, not a comprehensive COA. No identity, purity, heavy metals, endotoxin, or residual solvent testing is included. This is appropriate for a sterility-specific test but incomplete for full peptide characterization.
Rapid screening method
Document explicitly states this is a 'rapid screening method' with 2-day incubation, not full compendial sterility testing. The report notes 'For regulatory compliance, full compendial sterility testing may be required.' This is a preliminary QC test, not a definitive sterility certification.
Lab verification not possible
Kovera Labs is named as the testing facility. No website URL, contact information, or accreditation details are provided. The QR code and access code (F8A885) suggest a verification system exists, but cannot be validated from this document alone.
Clear batch identification
Lot number KSS2607 is clearly stated and matches the handwritten label visible on the vial photograph.
Same-day turnaround
Sample received and certified on the same date (06/30/2026). While rapid, this is consistent with the stated 2-day rapid screening methodology.
Professional presentation
Document has clean, professional formatting with clear sections, branded header, and includes a photograph of the actual sample vial for traceability.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.