Public COA audit
Ipamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- IP202606
- Issue date
- 2026-06-11
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.5 ppm, As <0.15 ppm, Cd <0.05 ppm, Hg <0.3 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only - no identity or purity testing
This COA only contains heavy metals analysis (ICP-MS). There is no identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC) or purity testing. A complete COA for a peptide should include identity verification and purity assessment.
Verification URL provided but not validated
Document lists koveralabs.com/verify with access code 6A2C3D and sample ID KVR-2026-AD226C. Independent verification recommended but not performed in this audit.
Analysis date within acceptable range
Analysis date of June 11, 2026 is before the current date (2026-07-29) and appears reasonable.
Batch number present
Lot/Batch IP202606 is clearly stated.
Professional presentation
Document has professional layout with clear tables, methodology description, spike recovery data, and quality control metrics. Includes lab director signature.
Incomplete testing for peptide verification
While heavy metals testing is legitimate and properly documented, this represents only one aspect of comprehensive peptide quality control. Missing critical identity and purity panels.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.