Public COA audit

Ipamorelin

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
IP202606
Issue date
2026-06-10

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    < 0.20 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Batch information present

    Lot/Batch IP202606 is clearly stated, along with product name (Ipamorelin), strength (10 mg), and condition (Lyophilized).

  • Single-panel COA

    This COA only reports endotoxin testing. No identity confirmation (MS, NMR), purity (HPLC), heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present. A complete peptide COA typically includes identity and purity at minimum.

  • Incomplete for comprehensive peptide verification

    While endotoxin testing is important for injectable peptides, the absence of identity and purity testing means this COA alone cannot confirm the compound is actually Ipamorelin or verify its concentration/purity. This appears to be a supplementary test report rather than a complete COA.

  • Professional lab presentation

    Kovera Labs presents a well-formatted report with proper USP <85> methodology, controls (positive/negative both passed), sample ID (KVR-2026-AD226C), access code (6D2EC1), and verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify). Lab director signature present.

  • Analysis date within acceptable range

    Analysis date 06/10/2026 is before the current date (2026-07-29) and represents a reasonable timeframe for recent testing.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.