Public COA audit
Glow Strength 70 mg
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- GW202603
- Issue date
- 2026-03-24
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.3 ppm, As <0.18 ppm, Cd <0.06 ppm, Hg <0.5 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only
This COA only contains heavy metals analysis (ICP-MS). No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), purity testing, or other standard peptide panels are present. This is a partial analysis report, not a comprehensive COA.
Lab verification needed
Kovera Labs is listed with verification URL koveralabs.com/verify and access code 2916E6. The lab name and professional formatting appear legitimate, but independent verification of the lab's existence and the specific sample ID (KVR-2026-6E0B96) is recommended.
Analysis date valid
Analysis date of March 24, 2026 is within acceptable range (before current date of July 28, 2026).
Professional presentation
Document shows professional formatting with clear methodology, spike recovery validation, quality control metrics, and dual authorization signatures. Method suitability data (spike recovery 93-101%) supports analytical validity.
No purity data
This report does not include HPLC purity analysis, which is typically the primary quality metric for peptide products. Heavy metals testing alone is insufficient for comprehensive peptide quality assessment.
No identity confirmation
No identity testing (MS, NMR, or other structural confirmation) is included. Cannot confirm the product is actually the stated peptide compound.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.