Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500

Audited July 28, 2026

Consistent with a legitimate COA

Document structure and test panels align with what we expect from authentic lab reports.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
4/7
Purity (printed)
99.886%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
GW202603
Identity method
LC-MS
Sample date
2026-03-25
Issue date
2026-03-25

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

4 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 3 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Glow

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.886%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    Complies

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    < 0.06 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity achieved

    Blend average purity of 99.886% with consistent individual vial measurements (99.791-99.956%) meets >98% specification. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed

    LC-MS identification confirms product as 'Glow' blend matching specification.

  • Batch conformity documented

    Four vials tested individually with detailed purity and net content measurements showing good batch consistency.

  • Analysis date documented

    Analysis date of 03/25/2026 is clearly stated and within reasonable timeframe.

  • Lab identification present

    Kovera Labs identified with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), report number KVR-2026-6E0B96, and access code S13ULFH provided.

  • Core safety panels included

    Endotoxin (LAL) and heavy metals (ICP-MS) testing completed and passed. Microbial and sterility panels not included, which is common for non-sterile research products.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, component analysis breakdown, batch conformity table, product photo, and QR code for verification. Professional layout consistent with legitimate testing lab.

  • Component analysis detailed

    Individual peptide components measured: BPC-157 (11.81mg vs 10mg labeled), TB-500 (11.02mg vs 10mg labeled), GHK-Cu (52.83mg vs 50mg labeled). All within acceptable overfill ranges.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.