Public COA audit
DSIP
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- DS202605
- Issue date
- 2026-05-07
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No microbial growth detected during the 14 day incubation period
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Incomplete testing panel - sterility only
This document only reports sterility testing results. No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC), purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or residual solvent testing is included. This is a partial COA that addresses only one aspect of quality control.
Lab verification not possible
Kovera Labs is not a widely recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory. No website URL, contact information, or accreditation details are provided. The QR code is present but cannot be verified from the static image.
Analysis date within acceptable range
Analysis date of 05/07/2026 (May 7, 2026) is before the current date of 2026-07-29 and is reasonable.
Batch number present
Lot/Batch DS202605 is clearly stated and follows a logical naming convention.
Professional presentation
Document has professional layout, clear methodology description, appropriate disclaimers about scope of testing, and includes sample photograph.
No identity or purity confirmation
Critical for peptide quality: this report does not confirm the product is actually DSIP or provide any purity measurement. Sterility alone does not validate the compound identity or concentration.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.