Public COA audit
CJC-1295 (No DAC)/Ipamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CJIP202602
- Issue date
- 2026-04-01
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.4 ppm, As <0.16 ppm, Cd <0.08 ppm, Hg <0.4 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only - incomplete COA
This document only contains heavy metals analysis (ICP-MS). A complete peptide COA should include identity confirmation (MS, NMR) and purity analysis (HPLC). This appears to be a supplemental panel report, not a full COA.
No purity data
HPLC or other purity analysis is absent. Cannot assess peptide purity from this document.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is present. Cannot confirm the compound is actually CJC-1295/Ipamorelin.
Heavy metals panel complete
ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg all pass with good spike recovery (104-105%). Method validation appears appropriate.
Lab identification present
Kovera Labs identified with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), sample ID KVR-2026-BCFDD3, and access code 42488A provided.
Batch number present
Lot/Batch CJIP202602 clearly stated.
Professional formatting
Document has professional layout, clear tables, QC data, authorization signatures, and QR code for verification.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.