Public COA audit

AOD-9604

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
AO202605
Issue date
2026-04-21

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    Pb <0.3 ppm, As <0.13 ppm, Cd <0.08 ppm, Hg <0.5 ppm

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Heavy metals panel complete

    ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg with spike recovery validation. All elements pass acceptance limits. Method suitability confirmed with recoveries 94-106%.

  • Professional lab presentation

    Kovera Labs report with verification URL, sample ID KVR-2026-803483, access code 247068, and lab director signature (Lemar Arghandiwal).

  • Analysis date valid

    Analysis date April 21, 2026 is within acceptable range (on or before 2026-07-29).

  • Limited scope - heavy metals only

    This is a specialized heavy metals analysis report. No identity, purity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent testing included. This is typical for supplemental testing but not a complete COA.

  • Batch information present

    Lot/Batch AO202605 clearly identified for AOD-9604 10mg lyophilized material.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.