Public COA audit

BPC-157 · GHK-Cu

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.5%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
q2wwe2u
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-03-03
Issue date
2026-03-31

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.5%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.71 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Branding inconsistency

    Document shows dual branding: 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' with Krause logo and signature. The header says 'Finnrick.com' but footer and methods reference Krause Analytical. This mixed branding pattern is unusual and suggests either a white-label arrangement or potential document manipulation.

  • Unusual batch/lot format

    Batch/lot number 'q2wwe2u' uses an atypical alphanumeric format that does not follow standard laboratory batch numbering conventions (typically date-based or sequential). Also matches the Test Certificate ID exactly, which is uncommon.

  • High chromatographic purity

    99.5% chromatographic purity is within normal range for research-grade peptides and is supported by the included chromatogram showing a clean dominant peak.

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    All four peptides show 'ID Confirmed' via HPLC-UV-MS with reference spectra included on pages 2-3. CAS numbers provided for each compound.

  • Limited testing scope

    Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels performed. Heavy metals method is described on page 4 but no results reported. No microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing performed or reported.

  • Date consistency

    Sample received 3/3/2026, testing performed 3/20-3/31/2026, report issued 3/31/2026. Timeline is logical and all dates are on or before the current date of 2026-07-29.

  • Large watermark overlay

    Heavy 'Finnrick' watermark across all pages may obscure some details and is more prominent than typical for legitimate COAs, though not necessarily indicative of fabrication.

  • Lab verification unclear

    Krause Analytical LLC is a known testing laboratory, but the Finnrick branding and verification URL (finnrick.com/verify) create ambiguity about the actual testing entity. The relationship between Finnrick and Krause is not explained on the document.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.