Public COA audit
Kisspeptin-10
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- N260709-010
- Issue date
- 2026-07-13
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity analysis
COA contains only an assay (quantity) test showing 11.2 mg vs 10 mg specification. No HPLC purity percentage, no chromatogram, no identity confirmation tests are present.
No identity verification
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is documented. Cannot verify the compound is actually Kisspeptin-10.
Minimal testing scope
Only a single assay test is reported. No purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing documented.
Batch identifiers present
Batch number N260709-010 and lot number SP26-KIV10 are clearly stated.
No sample/test date
Issue date is 2026-07-13, but no sample collection date or test execution date is provided.
Lab verification unclear
Qalitex Inc. claims ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation (AGS-US050824-1) but no verification URL or QR code link is provided to confirm accreditation status.
Page 2 is blank
Second page contains only header/footer with no additional test data, which is unusual for a multi-page COA.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.