Public COA audit
Ipamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.68%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- tcdvbn3
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2025-11-05
- Issue date
- 2025-11-17
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.68%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
99.68% purity by HPLC-UV/MS with clear chromatogram showing dominant peak at 5.53 min and minimal impurities
Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry
Mass spectrum matches reference standard for Ipamorelin with characteristic m/z 358 base peak and fragmentation pattern
Batch/lot number present
Lab # 130008, Sample ID tcdvbn3, Project 135460
Dates are consistent and valid
Sample received 2025-11-05, tested 2025-11-12, report issued 2025-11-17 - all dates are logical and within acceptable timeframe
Dual branding creates confusion
Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding. Header says Finnrick.com/Austin TX, but footer and methods reference Krause Analytical LLC at same address. Unclear if this is a legitimate partnership or rebranding.
Verification URL domain mismatch
Verification URL points to finnrick.com/verify but lab performing analysis is identified as Krause Analytical LLC. This dual identity is unusual and warrants verification.
Limited testing panels
Only identity and purity panels performed. Methods for endotoxin and heavy metals are described on page 3 but no results are provided. No microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing.
Professional presentation
Document includes detailed chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, methods summary, and proper laboratory signatures. Formatting is consistent with professional analytical lab reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.