Public COA audit

Ipamorelin

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
62
Confidence
78%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
APR-6410665
Identity method
UPLC, Mass Spectrometry (MS)
Sample date
2026-03-10
Issue date
2026-03-14

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed via UPLC and MS

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Identity testing present

    UPLC chromatogram and mass spectrometry data provided for Ipamorelin with PubChem CID 9831659

  • No purity value reported

    COA shows chromatographic and MS data but does not state a quantitative purity percentage, which is essential for research peptide quality assessment

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity testing performed. No purity quantification, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported

  • Batch number present

    Lot Number APR-6410665 clearly stated

  • Dates within acceptable range

    Received 2026-03-10, Analysis Conducted 2026-03-14 (4-day turnaround, reasonable)

  • Lab verification not independently confirmed

    Horizon Analytical listed with website horizonanalytical.com and contact email. Unable to independently verify lab accreditation or reputation from document alone

  • Professional presentation

    Document has professional layout with clear branding, chromatograms, and mass spectrum data

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.