Public COA audit
Ipamorelin
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.8%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-IPA10-2603-1
- Identity method
- FTIR (USP <197A>)
- Sample date
- 2026-04-02
- Issue date
- 2026-04-05
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of Ipamorelin with addition of excipient(s)/fillers
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.8%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
18.7 EU/vial (limit 40 EU/vial)
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity
99.8% purity is excellent and normal for research-grade peptides
FTIR confirmation
Identity confirmed via FTIR spectroscopy with characteristic peptide bands; excipients noted
Potency below specification
HPLC potency assay shows 59.6%, 90.7%, and 88.5% of labeled 10 mg across three measurements; two of three fall below the 90-110% specification range
Batch number present
Lot CR-IPA10-2603-1 clearly documented
Dates within normal range
Sample tested 4/2/2026, report issued 4/5/2026, endotoxin test 4/8/2026 with report 4/10/2026; all dates are reasonable and sequential
Lab information complete
BTLabs, West Palm Beach FL, with contact details and website provided
Endotoxin testing performed
Separate endotoxin COA (report IF-824-QSA-TR006-BTL26130-24) shows passing result at 18.7 EU/vial
Professional presentation
Document includes FTIR spectrum, HPLC chromatogram, QR code, signatures, and detailed methodology references
Limited testing scope
No heavy metals, microbial contamination, sterility, or residual solvent testing; document explicitly states it does not provide information on particulate matter or microbial contamination
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.