Public COA audit
CJC-1295
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- L1162
- Issue date
- 2025-07-07
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
As: 0.008 ppm, Cd: <0.001 ppm, Hg: <0.001 ppm, Pb: 0.014 ppm
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
Total Aerobic Count: <100 cfu/g, Total Coliforms: <10 cfu/g, E. coli: Absent, Salmonella: Absent, Staphylococcus: Absent, Total Yeast & Molds: <100 cfu/g
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity analysis
COA lacks HPLC or other purity testing, which is essential for peptide quality verification
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method present
Limited testing scope
Only heavy metals and microbial testing performed; missing identity, purity, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvent panels typical for injectable peptides
Batch information present
Lot number L1162 clearly stated
Lab verification unclear
INSTAMED branding present but no website, contact information, or accreditation details provided for independent verification
Professional appearance
Document has professional layout with signatures, dates, and organized test results table
Heavy metals testing comprehensive
All four major heavy metals (As, Cd, Hg, Pb) tested with appropriate USP 233 method and all results conform to specifications
Microbial testing thorough
Comprehensive microbial panel including aerobic count, coliforms, pathogens, and yeast/molds with appropriate USP methods
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (386 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.