Public COA audit
HMG
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- Test-ED6
- Sample date
- 2026-06-05
- Issue date
- 2026-06-24
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Only quantitative mass reported
Document reports only HMG mass (73.67 mcg) with no identity confirmation, purity analysis, or quality control panels. This is a quantitative assay report, not a comprehensive Certificate of Analysis.
No identity verification
No mass spectrometry, HPLC retention time, or other identity confirmation method reported. Cannot verify the substance is actually HMG.
No purity analysis
No HPLC purity percentage or impurity profile provided. Essential for peptide/compound quality assessment.
Batch number present
Batch Test-ED6 from manufacturer Swiss Chems is documented.
Dates within valid range
Testing ordered 2026-05-14, sample received 2026-06-05, analysis conducted 2026-06-24. All dates are sequential and on or before 2026-07-29.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party testing lab in the peptide/research chemical space. Verification URL and unique key (CECGIN2W2M8V) provided.
Minimal documentation
Report format is very basic with limited technical detail. No analytical methods, equipment, or quality standards referenced.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.