Public COA audit
HMG · Sample 4 HMG CY2023
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 2605-CY-HM
- Sample date
- 2026-06-18
- Issue date
- 2026-06-24
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
88.72 mcg
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Missing core peptide testing panels
This report only contains heavy metals (HMG) testing. No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), no purity analysis, no microbial/endotoxin testing. This is not a complete peptide COA.
Unusual test focus
Heavy metals testing (HMG) is typically a supplementary test for peptides, not the primary or sole analysis. Standard peptide COAs focus on identity and purity first.
No purity data
No HPLC purity percentage or chromatogram provided. Cannot assess peptide quality.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method reported.
Batch number present
Batch 2605-CY-HM is clearly stated.
Dates are valid and sequential
Testing ordered 16 JUN 2026, sample received 18 JUN 2026, analysis conducted 24 JUN 2026. All dates are sequential and on or before today (2026-07-29).
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide/research chemical space.
Verification URL provided
Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (1AKW4BZT9XH7) for authentication.
Minimal detail and context
Report is sparse with limited technical detail. Sample description states 'See picture or pictures attached' but provides no compound specification or expected values.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.