Public COA audit
Glutathione
Audited July 29, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- whm9fzc
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-06-04
- Issue date
- 2026-06-15
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 1 failed · 1 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · failed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Incorrect
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
ND
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Mass Spectral Match Failed
The identity test explicitly states 'Mass Spectral Match: Incorrect', indicating the sample does NOT match the expected compound (Glutathione). This is a fundamental failure of identity verification.
Purity Not Detected
Chromatographic purity shows 'ND' (Not Detected) with no percentage value. Combined with failed identity, this suggests the sample may not contain the claimed compound at all.
Glutathione Quantity Not Detected
The Glutathione quantification row shows 'ND' (Not Detected) in mg, indicating no measurable amount of the target compound was found.
Conflicting Lab Identities
Document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but the footer, signature, and methods reference 'Krause Analytical LLC'. The document appears to be a hybrid or altered version combining two different lab identities.
Inconsistent Branding
The Krause Analytical logo and branding appear throughout, but the header prominently displays 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com'. This dual-branding is highly unusual for legitimate COAs.
Heavy Watermarking
Large 'FINNRICK' watermarks cover the entire document, which is atypical for final issued COAs from established analytical labs.
Methods Described But Not Performed
Page 4 describes detailed methods for Endotoxins (USP/NF 86) and Metals (USP/NF 233), but no results for these tests appear in the actual analysis section. This suggests template reuse or incomplete testing.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.