Public COA audit
GHK-Cu · TB-500
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- N260710-001
- Identity method
- HPLC
- Issue date
- 2026-07-17
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
GHK-Cu, TB-500, BPC-157 detected by HPLC
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity analysis
COA reports only mass/assay values (mg quantities) but does not provide purity percentage for any of the three peptides. This is a fundamental omission for peptide quality control.
Identity confirmation incomplete
HPLC methods listed (TESTMET-CH-310, TESTMET-CH-321) appear to be quantitative assays rather than identity confirmation methods. No retention time, mass spec, or other identity verification data provided.
Missing critical safety panels
No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported. For a multi-peptide cosmetic/research product, these are typically expected.
Batch identifiers present
Batch number N260710-001 and lot number SP26-GPV30 clearly stated.
No sample/test dates
Issue date 2026-07-17 is present and valid (before 2026-07-28), but no sample receipt date or testing date range provided.
Lab verification unclear
Qalitex Inc. claims ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation (AGS-US050824-1) but no verification URL or QR code link provided. Lab name and accreditation number cannot be independently verified from this document.
Unusual test presentation
Tests report mass quantities (mg) rather than standard purity percentages. Product 'GLOW' appears to be a blend, but individual peptide purity is not characterized.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.