Public COA audit
GLOW · GHK-Cu
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.95%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 10222
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM (chromatographic retention time comparison with reference standard)
- Sample date
- 2026-06-21
- Issue date
- 2026-07-03
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed (GHK-CU + BPC-157 + TB-4)
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.95%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.95% peptide purity by HPLC area normalization, exceeds ≥95.0% specification
Multi-component blend identity confirmed
All three peptide components (GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-4) confirmed present by HPLC retention time matching
Fentanyl screening performed
Immunoassay screening for fentanyl (50 ng/mL cutoff) returned Not Detected - PASS
Batch/lot number present
Lot Number: 10222
Sample and analysis dates documented
Date Received: 06/21/2026, Analysis Date: 07/03/2026, Issued: 7/3/2026 (all dates are on or before 2026-07-29)
ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation claimed
ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation; footer states certificate relates only to items tested
Verification system provided
QR code and access code (7F2CJD2Z) for online verification at lab.ils-lab.com
Limited testing scope
COA includes identity, purity, and fentanyl screening only. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing reported
Professional presentation
Document includes HPLC chromatogram, detailed methodology notes, lab director signature, and comprehensive contact information
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.