Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.95%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
k47cprj
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2025-10-14
Issue date
2025-10-23

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.95%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    Chromatographic purity >99.95% by HPLC-UV/MS with supporting chromatogram showing clean single peak at 0.66 min

  • Identity confirmed with mass spectrum

    GHK-Cu identity confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with reference mass spectrum comparison showing matching m/z peaks (192, 172, 342)

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lab # 129581, Test Certificate ID k47cprj clearly documented

  • Dates consistent and reasonable

    Sample received 10/14/2025, testing 10/21/2025, report issued 10/23/2025 - all dates are sequential and within normal turnaround time

  • Testing lab identified with verification URL

    Krause Analytical LLC, Austin TX with verification URL https://finnrick.com/verify and Lab Director signature (Mark C. Krause)

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented

  • Professional presentation with supporting data

    Two-page report with chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, sample photos, and proper footer/header formatting consistent with professional analytical lab

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.