Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.83%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
p9rrja7
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-02-20
Issue date
2026-02-27

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.83%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High chromatographic purity

    99.83% purity by HPLC-UV/MS is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed

    Mass spectrum matches authentic GHK-Cu standard; CAS 49557-75-7 provided

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot p9rrja7 clearly stated; Lab # 201595; Project 145087

  • Dates are valid

    Sample received 2/20/2026, report issued 2/27/2026 (7-day turnaround, both dates ≤ 2026-07-29)

  • Lab information complete

    Krause Analytical LLC, 8127 Mesa Drive Suite B-206, Austin, TX 78759; signed by Mark C. Krause, Laboratory Director

  • Verification URL provided

    https://finnrick.com/verify with certificate ID p9rrja7

  • Limited testing panels

    Only identity and purity panels performed; endotoxin and heavy metals methods described on page 3 but no results shown; microbial, sterility, and residual solvent testing not performed

  • Professional presentation

    Includes chromatogram (page 2) and mass spectrum comparison; methods summary (page 3) references USP/NF standards; watermarked pages

  • Potency within specification

    103 mg recovered vs 100 mg label claim (102.9% of label) is within acceptable range

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.