Public COA audit
CJC-1295 W/O DAC · CJC-1295 without DAC
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.7%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- PPA-WL-CND5-P000707
- Identity method
- R-HPLC with Analytical Standard
- Sample date
- 2026-07-13
- Issue date
- 2026-07-27
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
34.2% Acetonitrile
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.7%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.7% purity by R-HPLC is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by analytical standard
R-HPLC retention time (34.2% acetonitrile) matches expected standard (34.0%), confirming compound identity
Batch number present
Lot number PPA-WL-CND5-P000707 clearly documented
Dates are consistent and current
Sample received 2026-07-13, analyzed and issued 2026-07-27 (14-day turnaround is reasonable)
Lab identified with signatory
Pacific Coast Biologics Inc with named chemist Ramon Rochin
Limited testing scope
Only identity, purity, and quantification panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is common for basic peptide COAs but limits safety assurance
Professional presentation
Document includes chromatogram, molecular formula (C152H252N44O42), molecular weight (3,364.9 Da), appropriate disclaimer, and clear pass/fail criteria
Lab verification not independently confirmed
No verification URL or QR code provided. Pacific Coast Biologics Inc cannot be independently verified from this document alone, though format appears professional
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.