Public COA audit

CJC-1295

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.5%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
H5ZYV53
Identity method
FTIR (USP <197A>) and HPLC (USP <621>)
Sample date
2026-04-30
Issue date
2026-05-04

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of CJC-1295 with addition of excipient(s)/fillers

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.5%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High HPLC purity

    99.5% purity by HPLC is within normal range for research-grade peptides and meets the ≥98% specification.

  • Identity confirmed

    FTIR and HPLC methods both confirm CJC-1295 identity with appropriate USP references.

  • Batch information present

    Lot number H5ZYV53 clearly stated with BT Sample ID 005000039803395.

  • Lab verification needed

    BTLabs (West Palm Beach, FL) contact information provided. Website https://btlabtesting.com should be independently verified. Digital signatures present but authenticity cannot be confirmed from document alone.

  • Limited testing scope

    COA explicitly states it does NOT provide information on particulate matter, microbial contamination, or endotoxins. No heavy metals, sterility, or residual solvent testing performed.

  • Potency exceeds specification

    HPLC potency assay shows 6.5 mg (130.4%) against labeled 5 mg, exceeding the 90-110% specification range. This is flagged as out-of-spec but may reflect overfill or measurement variation.

  • Dual branding present

    Document shows both BTLabs (testing lab) and Finnrick (customer/distributor) branding with verification URL at https://finnrick.com/verify. This is consistent with a vendor-commissioned test.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes FTIR spectrum, HPLC chromatogram, detailed methodology references (USP chapters), and dual scientist signatures with digital signature metadata.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.