Public COA audit
BPC-157
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.75%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- f9fpht2
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2025-11-26
- Issue date
- 2025-12-06
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.75%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
99.75% purity is excellent and normal for research-grade peptides. HPLC chromatogram shows clean single peak at 4.79 min with minimal impurities.
Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry
Mass spectrum matches reference standard for BPC-157 (m/z 711 base peak). CAS number 137525-51-0 provided.
Potency within specification
10.8 mg measured vs 10 mg label claim = 108.0% of label, which is acceptable variance for lyophilized peptides.
Established testing laboratory
Krause Analytical LLC is a known third-party analytical lab in Austin, TX. Signed by Mark C. Krause, Laboratory Director.
Batch tracking present
Lab # 130698, Project 135526, Sample ID f9fpht2 all clearly documented.
Dates are logical and recent
Received 2025-11-26, tested 2025-11-28, issued 2025-12-06. All dates are in the past relative to 2026-07-29 and follow logical sequence.
Limited testing panels
Only identity and purity panels performed. Methods for endotoxin and heavy metals are described on page 3 but no results are shown. This is not uncommon for basic COAs but limits comprehensive quality assessment.
Professional presentation
Multi-page report with chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, and detailed methods summary. Includes verification URL and proper copyright notices.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.