Public COA audit
BPC 157
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 62
- Confidence
- 78%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.45%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Identity method
- QTOF
- Sample date
- 2023-08-25
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
QTOF confirmed
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.45%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity
99.45% purity by HPLC with clear chromatogram showing dominant peak at 12.77 min and minor impurities totaling <0.6%
QTOF mass spec method stated
Identity confirmation method listed as Acquity H-class Plus Xevo G2-XS QTOF, though actual mass spec data not shown on this page
No lot/batch number
Lot number field shows 'N/A', which is unusual for a commercial COA and makes traceability difficult
No issue date
Analysis date is provided (2023-08-25) but no separate issue/report date is shown
Lab identified
Testing lab is Weipu with detailed address in Shanghai and contact information provided
Limited testing scope
Only purity and identity testing shown; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water content testing included
Professional presentation
Document has clear formatting, proper chromatogram with labeled peaks, and detailed contact information
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.