Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500 (TB4)
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Identity method
- blend analysis
- Sample date
- 2026-02-18
- Issue date
- 2026-02-25
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157: 6.10 mg, TB-500: 5.56 mg
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Missing batch/lot number
The Batch field is completely blank, making traceability impossible
No purity data
Report only shows quantitative amounts (mg) but provides no purity percentage or quality assessment
Quantitative only, no qualitative confirmation
Results show mass quantities but no confirmation of identity, molecular weight, or spectral data
Limited testing scope
Only blend quantitation performed; no purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent testing
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing lab in the peptide/research chemical space
Verification system present
Includes verification URL and unique key (U9Y64ATX7DL8) for authenticity checking
Dates are logical and current
Testing ordered 08 FEB 2026, sample received 18 FEB 2026, analysis conducted 25 FEB 2026 - all sequential and within 2026
Manufacturer listed as Unknown
No manufacturer information provided, reducing supply chain transparency
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.