Public COA audit

BPC-157

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
3-2-45804
Sample date
2025-08-04
Issue date
2025-08-04

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    < 0.01 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    Chromogenic LAL assay shows < 0.01 EU/mL, passing the 0.1 EU/mL threshold. Positive and negative controls both passed as expected.

  • Lot number present

    LOT #: 3-2-45804 clearly stated

  • Test date documented

    Test performed 08/04/2025, analyst signature dated same day

  • Testing lab identified

    BioRegen with contact information and verification instructions provided. QR code and validation key (BIOLABS2010) included for authenticity verification.

  • Limited scope - endotoxin only

    This is a single-panel report focusing exclusively on endotoxin testing. No identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or solvent testing included. This is common for specialized endotoxin testing but means comprehensive quality cannot be assessed from this document alone.

  • Professional presentation

    Document follows standard analytical report format with clear sections, reagent information, methodology details, and interpretation. Uses Thermo Fisher kit A39553 with documented standards and detection range.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.