Public COA audit
BPC-157
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.7%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-BPC10-2603-1
- Identity method
- FTIR (USP <197A>) and HPLC (USP <621>)
- Sample date
- 2026-04-02
- Issue date
- 2026-04-05
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of BPC-157 with addition of excipient(s)/fillers
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.7%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
18.2 EU/vial (limit: 40 EU/vial)
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity achieved
99.7% purity meets specification of ≥98%, which is normal for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by FTIR and HPLC
FTIR spectrum confirms BPC-157 presence with excipients/fillers; HPLC chromatogram shows single dominant peak at 3.713 min retention time
Batch/lot number clearly stated
Lot CR-BPC10-2603-1 with BT Sample IDs 005000039491435 (main COA) and 005000039491585 (endotoxin test)
Testing lab identified with contact information
BTLabs, 5730 Corporate Way Suite 220, West Palm Beach, FL 33407; website https://btlabtesting.com provided
Multiple analytical panels performed
Identity (FTIR), purity (HPLC), potency (HPLC), and endotoxin testing completed. Heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent/water testing not performed (common for research peptides)
Potency variation across three vials
Three vials tested showed potency of 102.9%, 70.5%, and 91.2% of labeled 10 mg. One vial (70.5%) falls below the 90-110% specification range
Professional formatting with supporting data
Report includes FTIR spectrum, HPLC chromatogram, detailed peak table, dual scientist signatures, QR code, and comprehensive test parameters
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.