Public COA audit

BPC 157 Arginate Salt · BPC 157

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.48%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Identity method
LC-MS with UV detection
Sample date
2025-04-01
Issue date
2025-04-11

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    BPC 157

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.48%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.48% purity by LC-MS with clear chromatogram showing single dominant peak

  • Identity confirmed

    Mass spectrometry data shows expected molecular ion peak at m/z 710.6654, consistent with BPC 157

  • Batch/Lot number missing

    No batch or lot number visible on the COA, which is important for traceability

  • Dates are reasonable

    Sample received 04/01/25, analysis conducted 04/11/25 - appropriate turnaround time

  • Lab information present

    BioRegen lab with analyst signature (Dr. Roberto Marin), verification URL provided

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity testing performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent testing

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted COA with clear sections, chromatograms, mass spec data, QR code for verification

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (473 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.