Public COA audit
AOD-9604
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- APR-371388B-P
- Identity method
- UPLC, Mass Spectrometry (MS)
- Sample date
- 2026-05-22
- Issue date
- 2026-05-17
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed by UPLC and MS
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
Not explicitly stated on page
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Issue date after received date
Analysis conducted date (05/17/2026) is listed as 5 days BEFORE the received date (05/22/2026), which is logically impossible. The lab cannot analyze a sample before receiving it.
Purity value not explicitly stated
While UPLC chromatograms are shown, no numerical purity percentage is printed on this page. A complete COA should state the purity result clearly.
Identity testing present
Both UPLC chromatograms and mass spectrometry data are provided. MS shows molecular ion at 1024.45 m/z with expected fragmentation pattern.
Batch/lot number present
Lot number APR-371388B-P is clearly stated.
Lab identification present
Horizon Analytical is identified with contact information and verification URL (horizonanalytical.com).
Limited testing scope
Only identity testing (UPLC/MS) is shown. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing is documented on this page.
Professional presentation
Document has professional layout with clear branding, PubChem CID reference (71300630), and appropriate analytical instrumentation data.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.