Public COA audit

CJC (no DAC) · CJC-1295 without DAC

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CJ202606
Issue date
2026-06-26

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    Pass

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Limited testing scope

    This COA only reports sterility testing (USP <71>). No identity confirmation, purity analysis, or other quality panels are included. This is a single-panel report, not a comprehensive COA.

  • No identity verification

    The sample name mentions 'Sterility w/ ID' but no identity test results (MS, HPLC, NMR) are shown on this page. Cannot confirm the compound is actually CJC-1295.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC or other purity analysis is reported. Sterility alone does not establish peptide quality or concentration.

  • Batch number present

    Client SID CJ202606 is clearly stated.

  • Issue date valid

    Published date 2026-06-26 is before today (2026-07-29) and is reasonable.

  • Lab information complete

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact info, and verification URL provided. Lab appears to be a real entity in Dorr, MI.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has proper branding, QR code, signatures from President and Managing Director, and standard COA layout.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.