@shoppers_micmac
1 post audited · 4 claims analysed
Science evidence grade
Based on 4 claims across 1 audit
3
Supported
75%
0
Overstated
0%
0
Misleading
0%
1
No Evidence
25%
Share this evidence grade
Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards
What @shoppers_micmac claims actually are
We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).
Evidence-based
75%
3 claims
Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.
Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.
Factually incorrect
0%
0 claims
Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.
Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.
Grey / overstated
25%
1 claim
Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.
Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.
Evidence mix
Share of audited claims in each bucket
Verdict detail
Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support
Claims over time
Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade
Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).
Audit history(1 post)
“CONGRATULATIONS JOUVIANCE for winning BEAUTY’S BEST 2025! Jouviance won this year for the Restructiv C-Peptide cream! Let Maya show you the ropes. #BeautyBestAwards2025 #TopBeautyCanada #BeautyInnovation #AwardWinningBeauty #CanadianBeauty #BeautyAddict #Beauty #shoppersdrugmart #shoppersbeauty #shoppersmicmac #mymicmac #micmacmall #jouviance”
Three of the four claims (skin smoothing, wrinkle reduction, and the undefined 'craniens') lack any scientific documentation. Only the vitamin C claim for dark spots is supported by published human clinical trials and peer-reviewed literature. The specific 'Restructive C Peptide Cream' product itself has no published efficacy data; one associated trial exists but has not yet enrolled subjects or generated results. Claims about the proprietary formulation cannot be validated against available evidence.
Audit another post from @shoppers_micmac
Paste their social post link to add a new audit