@nurserenee_

1 post audited · 2 claims analysed

Instagram profile

Science evidence grade

50%Moderate evidence grade

Based on 2 claims across 1 audit

SupportedOverstatedMisleadingNo Evidence

1

Supported

50%

0

Overstated

0%

0

Misleading

0%

1

No Evidence

50%

Share this evidence grade

Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards

What @nurserenee_ claims actually are

We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).

Evidence-based

50%

1 claim

Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.

Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.

Factually incorrect

0%

0 claims

Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.

Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.

Grey / overstated

50%

1 claim

Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.

Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.

Evidence mix

Share of audited claims in each bucket

Loading…
BackedIncorrectGrey

Verdict detail

Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support

Loading…

Claims over time

Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade

Loading…

Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).

Audit history(1 post)

Post thumbnail
Supported
Posted Dec 15, 2025·8 months ago·View source

Letting my brother edit a video

Neither claim for Vanilla Kiss Hydrating Peptide Lip Balm is supported by published peer-reviewed research. No human or animal studies specifically test barrier repair or rejuvenation properties of this product or similar peptide-based lip formulations. While general dermatological literature documents skin barrier mechanisms and cosmetic aesthetics separately, no direct evidence links peptide lip balms to either claimed outcome. Claims cannot be validated as supported without dedicated product or formulation testing.

Audit another post from @nurserenee_

Paste their social post link to add a new audit

New audit