@lorrainekamesha
1 post audited · 1 claims analysed
Science evidence grade
Based on 1 claim across 1 audit
0
Supported
0%
0
Overstated
0%
1
Misleading
100%
0
No Evidence
0%
Share this evidence grade
Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards
What @lorrainekamesha claims actually are
We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).
Evidence-based
0%
0 claims
Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.
Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.
Factually incorrect
100%
1 claim
Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.
Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.
Grey / overstated
0%
0 claims
Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.
Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.
Evidence mix
Share of audited claims in each bucket
Verdict detail
Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support
Claims over time
Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade
Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).
Audit history(1 post)
“Who can relate 😩 #over40women #momsover40 #over40club #over40wellness”
The claim 'peptides aren't safe' is not supported by the scientific literature and is, in fact, contradicted by robust human clinical trial data. Semaglutide and tirzepatide—well-characterized bioregulatory peptides—have completed Phase 2–4 RCTs demonstrating favorable risk/benefit profiles, with known, manageable side effects (primarily gastrointestinal and biliary). While peptides, like all bioactive compounds, carry context-specific risks and require appropriate sourcing and use, the categorical statement that peptides 'aren't safe' misrepresents the current state of evidence and appears designed to create blanket alarm rather than convey accurate safety information.
Audit another post from @lorrainekamesha
Paste their social post link to add a new audit