@gavindooleyy

1 post audited · 5 claims analysed

Instagram profile

Science evidence grade

20%Very low evidence grade

Based on 5 claims across 1 audit

SupportedOverstatedMisleadingNo Evidence

0

Supported

0%

2

Overstated

40%

0

Misleading

0%

3

No Evidence

60%

Share this evidence grade

Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards

What @gavindooleyy claims actually are

We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).

Evidence-based

0%

0 claims

Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.

Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.

Factually incorrect

0%

0 claims

Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.

Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.

Grey / overstated

100%

5 claims

Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.

Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.

Evidence mix

Share of audited claims in each bucket

Loading…
BackedIncorrectGrey

Verdict detail

Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support

Loading…

Claims over time

Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade

Loading…

Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).

Audit history(1 post)

Post thumbnail
⚠️ Overstated
Audited Mar 1, 2026·5 months ago·View source

Will the effects of GHK-CU last forever? #gym #florida #gymreels #viral #viralvídeo

The claims about GHK-Cu appear to be significantly exaggerated, with no robust scientific evidence supporting the specific skin healing and regeneration effects proposed. While GHK-Cu might have potential dermatological applications, the presented claims lack substantive scientific backing from human clinical trials.

Audit another post from @gavindooleyy

Paste their social post link to add a new audit

New audit