@dr_jonesdc
1 post audited · 6 claims analysed
Science evidence grade
Based on 6 claims across 1 audit
2
Supported
33%
1
Overstated
17%
0
Misleading
0%
3
No Evidence
50%
Share this evidence grade
Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards
What @dr_jonesdc claims actually are
We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).
Evidence-based
33%
2 claims
Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.
Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.
Factually incorrect
0%
0 claims
Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.
Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.
Grey / overstated
67%
4 claims
Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.
Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.
Evidence mix
Share of audited claims in each bucket
Verdict detail
Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support
Claims over time
Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade
Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).
Audit history(1 post)
“can you stack reta and tirz? yes but low doses of both. #reels”
Claims 1 and 4 are mechanistically sound and supported by established GLP-1/GIP and glucagon receptor biology confirmed in human trials. Claim 2 overstates terzepatide's appetite-suppression advantage without head-to-head comparative evidence. Claims 3, 5, and 6 lack any published evidence — they are speculative or unvalidated hypotheses. The post's core thesis (combining peptides for synergistic benefit with reduced side effects) is plausible but entirely untested in humans and should not be presented as evidence-based guidance.
Audit another post from @dr_jonesdc
Paste their social post link to add a new audit